I want to take a moment to express my gratitude to Adam Davidson, one of the sharpest, most insightful media personalities I know. I love what the NPR team is doing with Planet Money.

The segment they ran on Alec Litowitz, Magnetar, and their mortgage/collateralized debt obligations (CDOs) shorting strategies actually kept me sitting in my car in a parking garage until it was finished. Nobody should be allowed to read Michael Lewis's "The Big Short" until they've listened to it.

My book, The End of the Free Market, has just had the honor of serving as guinea pig (their term) for the first Planet Money "Deep Read" -- a good hour getting inside the arguments of the book and thinking about where the world is going. Before Adam begins an interview, he absorbs a book cover to cover, helping him conduct sharp, nuanced, provocative conversations.

I love that he peppered the interview with some of my favorite dystopian "corporations take over the world" movies. Network is an obvious choice. (I used it in the book.) Adam made me wish I'd also worked in a reference to Robocop. But the citation of Rollerball (the James Caan and John Houseman original) takes the gold. 

It also raises an interesting question: Why did so many folks think corporations would take over the world? Were screenwriters sharing a private joke about Hollywood's most megalomaniacal studio executives?

No matter. Each day provides more evidence that the power of the state is back. Salad days for political scientists.  

Ian Bremmer is president of Eurasia Group and author of The End of the Free Market: Who Wins the War Between States and Corporations? 

To experience the visual spectacle that is Avatar, Chinese audiences have flocked to theaters, with some reportedly paying up to $100 for a ticket. Yet, despite its spectacular success in China, the film has run into some trouble. Authorities have decided to pull the 2-D version of the movie from theaters to make way for a Chinese-made film on the life of Confucius. Why?

Part of the move is undoubtedly aimed at promoting homegrown cultural products at the expense of a formidable foreign competitor. But that can't be the only issue, especially since many Chinese have roundly extolled the film's creative revolution. Take a closer look, and you'll find that it's a quieter, subtler revolution that is unsettling the Chinese government. In Avatar, many Americans see a film about exploitation, militarism, and environmental sustainability. Many Chinese, however, see a cautionary tale about a form of social and economic injustice all too common across their country. To many Chinese bloggers, Avatar is a fable about unscrupulous Chinese officials forcefully evicting residents in the name of local development.

"Land development with an iron fist" has become a volatile issue for Beijing. Driven by rapid urbanization and the absence of property rights, city residents are often uprooted from their homes with little or no compensation to clear the ground for construction of luxurious new high-rises. City enforcement officials, known as "chengguan," are often in cahoots with local developers, granting permits in exchange for kickbacks. Flanked by public security officers, they demand that residents vacate or face removal by force. At times, the ham-fisted moves lead to tragic outcomes, as when a woman in Chengdu set herself on fire rather than be evicted. In another incident, when an elderly man threatened to jump off the roof if he was forcibly removed, a chengguan quipped, "Go straight to the top floor. Don't choose the first or second."

Public outrage at this behavior has run rampant, fueled by the stubbornness of petty officials with unchecked power. In recent years, individuals managed to attract national attention to the issue via iconic and viral images of the "nail house" (usually a single dilapidated shack standing amid razed ground, sticking out like a nail). The photo above tells the story.

These houses remain intact because the owners refuse to budge and chose to fight against developers. On Chinese blogs, commentators immediately recognized the Pandoran aliens Na'vis' tree home as a nail house, and the army that descended upon it as chengguan. Dripping with sarcasm, bloggers' reaction to Avatar as a metaphor for average Chinese woes is unmistakable: "The humans actually failed to successfully evict and demolish [the aliens]? Truly embarrassing. Why didn't they send China's chengguan there sooner?" And "China's demolition crews must go sue old [James] Cameron, sue him for piracy/copyright infringement!" 

With enormous numbers of comments like these moving across the web at lightning speed, Beijing, ever more preoccupied with public opinion on the Internet, grew nervous. Corruption is surely involved in many of the development deals, and it doesn't take much of a leap for the public to shift blame to the central government's inability to weed out corruption as promised. Though most of the ire is usually trained on local officials, the party leadership isn't going to take unnecessary risks. Few things arouse more fear in official circles than the loss of message control-and Avatar is just so popular. They decided they would need a wizened local sage to provide a little ancient wisdom.

Cue Confucius.

Damien Ma is an analyst in Eurasia Group's Asia Practice.