Today, Eurasia Group announces one of our most important
annual research reports -- Top Risks for 2009 --
and so I think it's only fitting that I kick off this blog with a look ahead at
the biggest sources of political risk for the coming year.
I'll tackle the top four in this post.
It's not hard to paint a negative outlook for the
coming year, given the political instabilities that such a serious global
economic downturn inevitably creates. But beneath the market turbulence that
will dominate the headlines in coming months will be two very important
structural factors: around the world, we'll see more state intervention in the
global economy, and much of that intervention will be reactive and badly
coordinated. In part, that's because many policymakers driving this trend will
be worrying more about local politics than about the global economy as they
make key decisions. That's why politics (and not market-savvy cost-benefit
analysis) will drive the global economy more directly (and less inefficiently)
in 2009 than at any point since the end of World War II.
In fact, our top risk comes directly from the U.S.
Congress. Political risks have historically been far more important for market
outcomes in developing states. That's not so this year. The current
financial crisis has created unprecedented opportunities for government
interference in economic affairs within rich states, and nowhere is that more
true than in Washington.
In response to the financial crisis, we can expect a broad range of financial
industry legislative and regulatory changes, direct government involvement in
plenty of economic enterprises and financial institutions, and fiscal policies
meant to spur economic growth.
The risk, of course, is that U.S. lawmakers will draw up
new rules and regulations that weigh on the free flow of finance and investment
for years to come. In short, the injection of political populism into the
creation of a new financial industry regulatory framework will produce all kind
of unintended consequences.
Second, 2009 will prove a tough year for South Asia. The locus of the world's terrorism/security
risks has been moving steadily eastward over the past decade-from
Israel/Lebanon to Iraq/Iran and now to Afghanistan/Pakistan/India. Pakistan's internal political, economic and
security problems are creating spillover effects into Afghanistan and India;
and responses from both countries (and from the United
States) exacerbating Pakistan's instability and increase
security tensions across the region. Perhaps the biggest risk of all -- a major
terrorist attack inside the United
States -- is much more likely to come from
terrorists operating out of Pakistan/Afghanistan than from anywhere else.
Third, 2009 will be the critical year for risk in Iran.
Ultimately, the United States
and its European allies are privately prepared to deal with a nuclear Iran. The
Israeli government isn't, and is under much greater domestic pressure to block
it. Given the strong possibility that Likud leader Benjamin Netanyahu will
become the next Israeli prime minister early this year, we can expect Israel to continue to take a confrontational
approach toward Tehran.
Iran will hold its own presidential election in June. The
country's hardliners are increasingly unpopular on the economy, but they're
much stronger on national security and the nuclear issue. That will give them
all the motivation they need to answer real or perceived Israeli threats with
threats of their own -- and with support for proxies in Lebanon and the Palestinian
territories. We could also see Iranian moves against U.S. warships in the Strait
of Hormuz and the use of friendly Iraqi groups to stir up trouble in the south
of Iraq.
Fourth, with the impact of the global financial
crisis, politics have taken an interesting turn in Russia. Despite the continued
popularity of Prime Minister Vladimir Putin and a lack of organized political
opposition in the country, we're still starting to see significant social
unrest across Russia.
For the first time in years, we've seen serious demonstrations, in 30 cities,
following the imposition of import duties on foreign-made used cars. We're
likely to see much more turbulence in 2009, as the economic downturn forces
factories to close and workers off the job. Russians have seen this kind of
hardship before, but only in the context of a very different kind of economic
system.
Where could this go? The Russian government won't
likely have much tolerance for dissent. And with the highest levels of
anti-Americanism (and, in many quarters, of broader xenophobia) of any
significant emerging market in the world, this has the potential to make
security a serious concern -- and to lead to boycotts of western goods. The Obama
administration is not likely to keep quiet during a crackdown in Russia. That's
part of why Russia's
relations with the United States
and many European countries are likely to get even worse in 2009. The Germans,
who are more dependent on the Russians economically and, to some extent,
politically, will play the role of wild card.
Read More
(0)
HIDE COMMENTS LOGIN OR REGISTER REPORT ABUSE