Posted By Ian Bremmer Share

By Gemma Ferst

The lack of global leadership, what we at Eurasia Group call the G-Zero, has become a common refrain among international thinkers. But while others wring their hands, over in his Ak Orda (White Horde) palace in windswept Astana, Kazakhstan's President Nursultan Nazarbayev is planning to do something about it.

In February, he launched G-Global: a bid to hatch a new world order through the exchange of ideas. Styled as an "electronic Bretton Woods," G-Global will disseminate a plan for global reform in May. On hand to provide intellectual firepower is the Eurasian Economic Club, which, bringing together top economists from Tajikistan to Moldova, has already produced a draft.

The road to Utopia could be long, though. Although G-Global boasts 10,000 members from 28 countries, the vast majority (more than 40,000) of the posts on its forum emanate from a single doctoral candidate at Irkutsk State Technical University, formerly the Siberian Mining Institute. None of the 543 participants who signed up in the last month has so far weighed in, suggesting that global traction may still be a ways off.

Nazarbayev, a former metallurgist who has ruled his oil-rich country since Soviet times, has long been something of a blue-sky thinker. The absence of criticism from his citizenry, combined with plenty of petrodollars, has fed an apparently genuine belief that it is his destiny to solve more than just Kazakhstan's problems. Previous schemes include a new, as yet unrealized global currency dubbed the Akmetal and an annual Congress of World Religions in Astana. (Nazarbayev commissioned British architect Norman Foster to design the $58 million Palace of Peace and Reconciliation -- a pyramid housing an opera house in its basement -- just to host the event.) He also came up with the idea of a Eurasian Union, well before Putin took it up again last year

Nazarbayev cares greatly about how outsiders perceive him. He spends huge sums on Western public relations campaigns and has taken on Tony Blair as an adviser. Indeed, at 71, he is hoping to establish his legacy as an international statesman, peace-builder, and possible Nobel Peace Prize winner.

What G-Global really shows us, though, is what happens when authoritarian states try to innovate. Billed as a platform for free-wheeling discussion, G-Global comes with a code of conduct that is both granular and draconian. Contributors are forbidden to "maliciously non-adhere to the rules of the Russian language," for example, and are instructed to exclude any "political content" from their posts -- a practice that would seem to put the kibosh on serious attempts at revamping global governance.

This same autocratic reflex will hamper Kazakhstan's bid to become one of the world's most competitive economies by 2015. Nazarbayev refers to innovation as a "gigantic leap of the Kazakhstani snow leopard into the future" and has ordered the country's state-owned firms to modernize. But these firms -- even the start-ups -- are ruled with a centralized iron fist. And the government's response to unrest, notably the deadly violence in Zhanaozen last December, is always to tighten the leash.

With G-Global, Nazarbayev wants to "radically widen the number of participants in seeking anti-crisis solutions for the world." But he won't countenance a similar widening of Kazakhstan's own political process (letting the opposition stand in elections would be a start), which is why this particular snow leopard won't be influencing global leaders any time soon.

Gemma Ferst is an analyst in Eurasia Group's Eurasia practice.

MIKHAIL METZEL/AFP/Getty Images

 

NURBEK

3:50 PM ET

March 1, 2012

Regarding G-global

"What G-Global really shows us, though, is what happens when authoritarian states try to innovate. Billed as a platform for free-wheeling discussion, G-Global comes with a code of conduct that is both granular and draconian. Contributors are forbidden to "maliciously non-adhere to the rules of the Russian language," for example, and are instructed to exclude any "political content" from their posts -- a practice that would seem to put the kibosh on serious attempts at revamping global governance."

It is good that G-global was written here on this web-site, but as a person who supervises the web-site and its content I cannot agree with Mr. Ian Bremmer as this site is completely managed by its users without limited control from moderators (practically we do not have a moderator till the moment). No one is influencing the content except the one who writes on it. And our strategic goal is to involve the English speaking audience for discussing and debating the issues of society and world economy.
Contributors are free to write any issues and any topic they would like to write, please check it with a russian or kazakh translator, or better paste your own comments or topics for discussion. Welcome any time.

 

MR FEEDOM

11:23 AM ET

March 2, 2012

A new launch

It makes sense! G-global or G-Zero by Roubini can be started anywhere from now, it's a good initiation of your President to first bring people virtually.
You should invite Ian to visit Kazakhstan and evaluate the G-global from there, is not it a good idea?

 

JUNGHOKIM

6:10 AM ET

March 2, 2012

Is this a joke?

The man seems to suffer from a typical case of megalomania.

 

MAXIMB

2:08 PM ET

March 20, 2012

One way to answer this

One way to answer this question is is to say that the U.S.A.'s governmental structure and philosophy is and has been democratic republicanism, which means that there is considerable rule by the masses, and also significant limits on the rule of the masses. And, in general, the U.S.A. has promoted this philosophy of government in its dealings with other nations. This is not the whole story, but it is a part of it..

"Is rio orange war always comparateur forfait inevitable ?"
MaximB

 

The Call, from Ian Bremmer, uses cutting-edge political science to predict the political future -- and how it will shape the global economy.

Read More